WORKS CITED-
Secondary Sources-
Patrick, John J. "New Jersey v. T.L.O." Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion. Dec. 1 2001: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Dec 2012
- We used this source because it really helped show why the court ruled how they did.
Czubaj, Camilia Anne. "A legal analysis of school searches." Education 115.4 (1995): 548+. Gale Power Search. Web. 6 Dec. 2012.
- This source was helpful in determining what was legal and what was not when searching students.
Persico, Deborah. "The Future of Reasonable Searches." 6. New Jersey v. T.L.O:
Drug Searches in Schools. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1998.
97-107.
- This source was important because it had a lot of information about the story and the case because it was from a book.
"CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY." http://www.law.cornell.edu.
Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 9 Dec. 2012.
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/
USSC_CR_0469_0325_ZS.html>.
- This source was extremely relevant to showing the reasons why the search was legal and the amendment's definition.
Patrick, John J. "New Jersey v. T.L.O." Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion. Dec. 1 2001: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Dec 2012
- We used this source because it really helped show why the court ruled how they did.
Czubaj, Camilia Anne. "A legal analysis of school searches." Education 115.4 (1995): 548+. Gale Power Search. Web. 6 Dec. 2012.
- This source was helpful in determining what was legal and what was not when searching students.
Persico, Deborah. "The Future of Reasonable Searches." 6. New Jersey v. T.L.O:
Drug Searches in Schools. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1998.
97-107.
- This source was important because it had a lot of information about the story and the case because it was from a book.
"CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY." http://www.law.cornell.edu.
Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 9 Dec. 2012.
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/
USSC_CR_0469_0325_ZS.html>.
- This source was extremely relevant to showing the reasons why the search was legal and the amendment's definition.
Primary Sources-
"NEW JERSEY v. T.L.O." n.pag. SIRS Government Reporter. Web. 13 Dec 201
- This was an important source because it showed the differences between "reasonable suspicion" and "probable cause".
PHILIP HAGER
Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Oct 3, 1984;
ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 - 1989)
pg. 13
- This source was great to use because it really showed what people thought of the case when it actually happened.
PHILIP HAGER
Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Jan 16, 1985;
ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 - 1989)
pg. SD1
- This source was useful because of the great primary imformation and opinions that we could deduce from it.
Patrick, John J. "New Jersey v. T.L.O." Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion. Dec. 1 2001: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web.14 Dec 2012.
-This source was really helpful because of the great information it provided about T.L.O. and her parents reason for defended.
"NEW JERSEY v. T.L.O." n.pag. SIRS Government Reporter. Web. 13 Dec 201
- This was an important source because it showed the differences between "reasonable suspicion" and "probable cause".
PHILIP HAGER
Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Oct 3, 1984;
ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 - 1989)
pg. 13
- This source was great to use because it really showed what people thought of the case when it actually happened.
PHILIP HAGER
Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File); Jan 16, 1985;
ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 - 1989)
pg. SD1
- This source was useful because of the great primary imformation and opinions that we could deduce from it.
Patrick, John J. "New Jersey v. T.L.O." Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion. Dec. 1 2001: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web.14 Dec 2012.
-This source was really helpful because of the great information it provided about T.L.O. and her parents reason for defended.